Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission vs. U S West Communications, Inc.

by Washington (State). Office of the Attorney General.

Written in English
Published: Downloads: 545
Share This

Subjects:

  • Lummi Tribe.

Edition Notes

May 4, 1992.

The Washington Independent Telephone Association (the Association), a trade organization of independent rural telephone companies, claims that the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (the Commission) violated the Association members' due process rights by designating, at an open public meeting, an additional telecommunications provider in the rural areas previously . On Ma , US WEST Communications, Inc. (US WEST), Toledo Telephone Company (Toledo), and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) filed, pursuant to Section 3(25) of the Communications Act of , as amended, 1 a joint petition to provide two-way, non-optional expanded local calling service (ELCS) between. The board of directors of Yankee Energy System, Inc. has elected Ellen J. Quinn v.p., corporate and environmental planning, and Sarah K. Sanders treasurer for the company. Before joining Yankee Energy, Quinn worked as a scientist at Northeast Utilities, and at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. California's electric restructuring plan, launched on April 1, , marks one of the most ambitious attempts in U.S. history to place the state in a social engineering role. Not only was the scale of the project daunting, with implementation cost estimates running as high as $ billion, but the plan places California government in control of.

and Light Co. v. ICC, F.2d (7th Cir. ); Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission v. FCC, F.2d (9th Cir. ). 4 Communications Act of , as amended by the Telecommunications Act of , 47 U.S.C. § et seq., , Stat. 56 () (West Supp. ) (“Act” or “ Act”). Except as provided in chapter WAC, all written communications and documents should be addressed to: Office of the Secretary, Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission, S Evergreen Park Dr SW, PO Box , Olympia WA , and not to individual members of the commission staff. (2) Receipt of communications. Glassdoor has 5 Utilities & Transportation Commission, Washington reviews submitted anonymously by Utilities & Transportation Commission, Washington employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Utilities & Transportation Commission, Washington is .   The new chairwoman of the powerful Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission has a daunting task ahead: striking a delicate balance between the competing interests of companies and consumers.

  Seattle startup Dolly is suing the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission in a case with potentially far-reaching implications for gig . On March 5, , US West Communications, Inc. filed a petition requesting that the Commission exercise its authority to forbear from regulating U S West as a dominant carrier in the provision of high capacity services in the Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Statistical Area, pursuant to Section 10 of the Telecommunications Act of Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission WA Frances Resheske SVP Con Edison NY Mary Retka VP - Industry Relations & Public Policy Somos, Inc. VA Alexandra Revel Communications & Member Relations Manager Public Utilities Fortnightly VA.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission vs. U S West Communications, Inc. by Washington (State). Office of the Attorney General. Download PDF EPUB FB2

P.2d () Wash.2d 48 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Colorado corporation, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

On FebruUS West Communications, Inc. (US West or the Company) petitioned the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission) for a.

80 US WEST v. UTILS. AND TRANSP. COMM'N Dec. Wn.2d 74, P.2d On FebruUS West Communications, Inc. (US West or the Company) petitioned the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission) for a statewide general rate increase for telephone services.[1] US West sought approximately * $ million a year in additional revenues, phased in over four years.

Plaintiff U.S. West Communications, Inc. ("US West") seeks review of determinations made by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission ("WUTC") in approving an interconnection agreement entered into pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 47 U.S.C. § (e) (6) purports to grant this court authority to conduct such review.

U.S. West Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, an Agency Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Washington; Anne Levinson, As Member of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission; Richard Hemstad, As Member of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission; William S.

Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission, Petitioner, v. Federal Communications Commission and United States Ofamerica, Respondents,data Transmission Co. et al., al Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Petitioners, v. Federal Communications Commission and United States Ofamerica, Respondents, F.2d (9th Cir.

) case opinion from the US. This is an appeal by U S West Communications, Inc. ("U S West") and a cross-appeal by MCI Telecommunications Corporation ("MCI") from a district court judgment entered after review of a Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission ("WUTC") WUTC decision approved an agreement between U S West and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Complainant v. US West Communications, Inc., Respondent Docket No. UT and TCG Seattle and Digital Direct of Seattle, Inc., Complainant v. US West Communications, Inc., Respondent Docket No. UT and TCG Seattle, Complainant v. See Washington Util.

and Transp. Comm'n v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., WL (Wash.U.T.C.). West Communications appealed that rate order to the King County Superior Court, which affirmed the order. West Communications appealed that decision to the Washington Supreme Court, which also affirmed.

Transportation; Utilities; Annual Report Forms; Federal Comments; File Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission vs. U S West Communications Make a Payment Now; Online Payments; Online Security; Public Safety. Pipeline Safety; Rail Safety; Transportation Safety; Intrastate Facilities; Public Safety Forms; Public Safety Publications; Documents and Proceedings.

External; 2C Captains d/b/a Let. The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has orderedU S West Communications, Inc., a local exchange carrier (LEC) to reduce the price of "essential monopoly" services it provides its payphone competitors to cure a price squeeze in the public payphone services market.

Using an "imputation test," the UTC found that the cost of a local telephone call was greater than the LEC's. HOW TO FIND US. The commission is located at: Woodland Square Loop SE, Lacey, WA The commission's mailing address is: PO BoxOlympia, WA Phone: Fax: Map and Directions.

We are Connecting Washington communities for a healthy and prosperous future. and Beyond is a transportation policy plan for all of Washington State.

It provides the overarching framework for transportation departments statewide, so that we can work together to achieve our transportation goals. Visit WTP website. Contact: PO Box Olympia, WA E-mail Overview The Utilities and Transportation Division is one of the smaller divisions in the AGO.

One division chief, six Assistant Attorneys General, one Legal Secretary 3, and one Legal Secretary 2/25% Paralegal, provide legal services to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC or Commission). Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Access electronic copies of documents in commission cases and proceedings on this page.

Public Records Request. Many of our records are available online. If you are unable to find the document you want, or need copies. Verizon Communications, Inc. F.C.C., U.S. ,2d (). In this state, the legislature delegated rate-making power to the Commission, which is obliged to assure fair prices and service to customers, as well as sufficient earnings to the utilities.

West Jackson Blvd, 6th Fl: Chicago: IL: The showing required is described in WLVA, Inc. Federal Communications Commission, D.C. F.2d(): "(A) petitioner seeking a hearing on the Carroll issue must plead specific factual data sufficient to make out a prima facie case that the economic consequences of a grant of the challenged application will.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission s Tour Seattle, Docket TE; 3Z Movers, LLC, Docket TV access washington. F.3d (9th Cir. ) US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

MFS INTELENET, INC.; SHARON L. NELSON, Chairman; RICHARD HEMSTAD, Commissioner; WILLIAM P. GILLIS, Commissioner, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission; and WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION.

US West Communication, Inc. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission and Public Counsel Sherilyn Peterson Edward Shaw Shannon Smith, Gregory Trautman, Sally Johnson & Robert Manifold This is a review of a Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Order granting in part and denying in part a US West petition for an accounting.

The Amended Agreement is between SBC Telecom, Inc., (SBCT), and Qwest Corporation (Qwest), f/k/a U S WEST Communications, Inc. The Commission previously approved an interconnection agreement between the parties on February 9,a first amended agreement on Jand a second amended agreement on Octo court.

U.S. West Communications. Inc. Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Wn.2d 74,P.2d (). Because the defendant has failed to properly raise any additional issues for review, the Court should refuse to review them.

Ill. CONCLUSION The reasons the defendant gives to argue this Court should. On FebruWestgate Communications, LLC d/b/a WeavTel (WeavTel) filed a petition for a Permanent Revenue Objective of $, On Ma the commission entered Order 07 Complaint and Order Suspending Proposed Increase to WCAP Revenue Objective.

On April 4, the commission issued a notice of Prehearing Conference set for May 7, at the UTC Headquarters. Before the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Docket Nos.

UF, UP Re: Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Complainant vs. US WEST Communications, Inc., Respondent; Application of US WEST Communications, Inc., for an Alternative Form of Regulation On behalf of TRACER. virtual NXX (“VNXX”) dialing pattern in the state of Washington, and the proper intercarrier compensation for VNXX calls.

Details of the dispute are set forth in Qwest’s complaint and the parties’ answers, filed under this same docket number with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (“Commission”). In the Matter of the Consolidated Cases Concerning the Registration of Electric Lightwave, Inc.

and Registration and Classification of Digital Direct of Seattle, Inc. ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, INC., ET AL, Respondents, WASHINGTON INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Appellant. Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, in Re: Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Complainant vs.

US WEST Communications, Inc., Respondent; Application of US WEST Communications, Inc., for an Alternative Form of Regulation, Docket Nos. UF, UP, on behalf of TRACER, Direct Testimony filed June MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Inc.,plaintiffs-Appellants v.

U.S. West Communications, a Colorado Corporation the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission(wutc) Anne Levinson, Chair Richard Hemstad William P. Gillis, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of Wutc, MCI Telecommunications. US WEST, INC., a Delaware Corporation; US West Communications Group, Inc., a Colorado Corporation; and US West Dex, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v.

Sharon L. NELSON, in her official capacity as chairman of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission; Richard Hemstad, in his official capacity as commissioner of.

Customer Deposit Demands by U.S. West: Reasonable Rationales and the Proper Assessment of Risk PREPARED ON BEHALF OF: The Staff of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Docket No.

UT U.S. West Communication Inc.'s Request of Temporary Waiver of WAC and PREPARED BY: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan.Power and Light Co. v. ICC, F.2d (7th Cir. ); Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission v. FCC, F.2d (9th Cir.

). 4 Communications Act ofas amended by the Telecommunications Act of47 U.S.C. § et seq.,Stat. 56 () (West Supp. ) (“Act” or “ Act”). A big issue between the company and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission centers on how many spare telephone lines U S West .